Colleagues and I have just published a new article in the journal, Global Health Action.
It is titled Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa.
As the article explains, “The focus on priority-setting is in response to the urgent need to ensure scarce resources are used effectively in support of Universal Health Coverage, and the scant literature discussing how technical economic evaluations should be integrated into highly political and complex priority-setting processes. Researchers’ roles in developing capacity in these areas are highlighted because few African governments have technology assessment units that can take responsibility for driving formal priority-setting processes.”
Here is some information on my latest policy brief, as well as the report on which it is based:
EQUINET Policy Brief 35: Legislation on the for-profit private health sector in East and Southern Africa
Doherty J (2013) with UCT HEU, TARSC. Wemos Foundation, Policy brief 35, EQUINET, Harare
While the private sector contributes new resources to the health system, international evidence shows that if left unregulated it may distort the quantity, distribution and quality of health services, and lead to anti-competitive behaviour. As the for-profit private sector is expanding in east and southern African (ESA) countries, governments need to strengthen their regulation of the sector to align it to national health system objectives. This policy brief examines how existing laws in the region address the quantity, quality, distribution and price of private health care services, based on evidence made available from desk review and in-country experts. It proposes areas for strengthening the regulation of individual health care practitioners, private facilities and health insurers. A more detailed discussion paper (#87) on the laws and information in the brief is available at www.equinetafrica.org/bibl/docs/EQ%20Diss%2087%20Private%20HS.pdf.
I would like to get into contact with researchers, policy-makers and legal experts working on appropriate policies and legislation governing the for-profit private health sector in Africa.
Or perhas you do work on other low- or middle-income countries that might be relevant to the African situation?
On the ‘About Jane Doherty’ tab above you will find my e-mail address if you want to let me know about the work you are doing or have research or reports to share.
On the ‘Private health sector’ tab you will find my own work on the private sector (with links to the electronic versions where available). Of particular interest might be:
- FORTHCOMING: A situation analysis of private sector legislation in East and Southern Africa which is still in an early draft form
- FORTHCOMING: Doherty J, McIntyre D. (2013) Addressing the failings of public health systems: should the private sector be an instrument of choice? In: Surender R, Walker R. (2013) Social policy in a developing world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
- Doherty J. 2011. Expansion of the private for-profit health sector in East and Southern Africa. EQUINET with HEU, UCT and TARSC Policy Brief 26. Harare: EQUINET.
- Doherty J. 2011. Expansion of the private health sector in East and Southern Africa. EQUINET Discussion Paper 87. EQUINET: Harare.
- A report summarising research on the for-profit private health sector in South Africa from the 1980s to 2003: Doherty J, Steinberg M. 2003. Priority health care information needs for reform: what role for BHF? Johannesburg: Board of Healthcare Funders.
I recently contributed to an article appearing in the journal Health Policy and Planning. Entitled Influencing policy change: the experience of health think tanks in low- and middle-income countries, it includes findings from a case study of the Health Economics Unit in Cape Town.
The link can be found on my page Policy research which can be accessed via the tab above or from the ‘My Pages’ list on the right of this page.
The link below is for a 30-minute BBC podcast that would make an excellent teaching case study. It’s called Unsure about Sure Start and examines the 10-year history of this early childhood development intervention in the UK.
Fascinating issues are raised around the problems of implementing equity-oriented programmes that have diverse impacts, whether these are useful when underlying structural problems remain, how policy champions struggle to promote change when researchers cannot generate evidence quickly enough or in useful formats, and issues of study design when implementing large-scale, multi-impact interventions.
The journalist does a really good job of tracing the history of the intervention and attempts to evaluate it. She raises all the pertinent issues and her conclusion is very challenging: all good stuff to get students debating!
My full CV is now available on my page ‘About me’ (the tab is at the top of the screen or you can find it listed under ‘My Pages’ on the right of the screen).